The Rabid Conservative

President Obama just showed us all, once again, how truly evil and immoral liberalism is. He spent yesterday celebrating how wonderful abortion is, how there is a ‘fundamental constitutional right’ and how it is precious to protect so-called ‘reproductive rights and the right to choose’.

First off, there is no fundamental constitutional right to abortion. Where the heck does the Constitution guarantee a woman to kill her baby? I’ve read the constitution lots of times and there is nothing in there about aborting a fetus, reproductive rights, or a right to choose what a woman does with her own body. The Constitution is a document that limits what the government can do, not permits the government to make allowances, just because the text doesn’t actually forbid it. Liberals love a “living Constitution”, but hate life, unless it’s “convenient”.

Second, the Declaration of Independence discusses the fundamental rights of man, life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. I maintain that this is an ordered list. This means life trumps all, before liberty, before the pursuit of happiness. The pursuit of happiness should never override someone else’s liberty and liberty should never override someone else’s life.

Now, if someone willingly gives their own life for the cause of liberty, that is definitely honorable. But abortion is about sacrificing the baby’s life for the mother’s liberty – and that is detestable.

So, with this milestone of nearly 55 million dead as the result of the holocaust of abortion, I’m going to throw out a series of points that focus on truth, not illusions.

1. The left has made a massive effort to disguise the entire idea sing flowery language such as ‘reproductive rights’ and ‘a woman’s right to choose’ while completely ignoring the life of the baby. I agree that a woman has a right to choose, but maybe she should have chosen to keep her knees together in the first place. No, this isn’t about choice, it’s about having unrestricted sex and not having to face the consequences of that decision.
2. The left calls the pro-life ‘anti-abortion’ as if that’s actually a bad thing. The thing is, if we are ‘anti-abortion’, then they are ‘anti-life’. There is nothing good about destroying life out of convenience – that’s among the highest orders of evil of which humanity is capable.
3. And for all of you drones out there that start talking about the ‘big three’, rape, incest, maternal peril, let me remind you again of the statistics. Less than 5% of all the 1.2 million baby killings in this country are as a result of rape, incest, or maternal peril. But yet, the left keeps throwing this back up in our faces as if this is the majority. That’s a red herring folks. Blood red.
4. Obama makes the point that the government should not interfere in private family matters, and for the most part, I agree. However, in a situation where a family member kills another family member, you can bet that the government, law enforcement, will definitely be involved. A person cannot choose to kill another member of their family and get away with it. So why do we allow it, just because a certain family member has not passed through the birth canal and been born?
5. More of that flowery language stuff, it’s not ‘killing babies’, it’s ‘aborting the fetus’. Because it’s not a “baby”, it’s a “fetus”. (did anyone ever tell these morons that “fetus” is Latin for “baby”. Interestingly when a so-called pro-choicer is pregnant and wants to have the child, she calls it a baby, not a fetus or some other diminishing term.
6. I wonder what would happen if the fetus had a chance to speak on his/her own behalf, what THEY would choose? When a person cannot voice their wishes, it’s generally within the context of the law that we err on the side of safety and caution. But abortion says that the baby’s life is forfeit unless someone else decides it has a right to live.

So there it is – the 39th anniversary of one of the most devastatingly evil pieces of legislation this country has ever known. 55 million dead. Isn’t that worth celebrating?

Every once in a while, we write one of these – just a random smattering of news stories that are barely worth a full blog post, but when put them all together, it makes enough of one.  A long time ago, a fellow brick-throwing blogger started a tradition and I think it’s high time to let tradition have its due – again. 

` Chelsea Clinton returns to the media spotlight as a journalist.  – Oh goodie.  Another reason not to watch NBC.  Why the heck is this even in the news?  What relevance does the young Ms. Clinton have anyway?  The sad part of this article is that the writer talks about the young Clinton running for Congress.  That’s a face-palm moment there.

Obama: It really doesn’t matter who the GOP nominates – of course it doesn’t, because any Republican with a pulse can beat you, Mr. President.  Your socialistically driven nonsense, wasted cronyism spending, and lack of leadership has made it so that any Republican could beat you.  And you are right, Mr. President, most all Republicans have a different vision than you – one where less government and lower taxes with reduced government spending rule the day.

Now this is just funny – turns out that General Hossein "Salami" is saying that Iran won’t return the drone that they captured from the US, boasting about their intelligence program.  Actually, that would be classified as a stroke of luck because for that one that malfunctioned and you found, there are about twenty more taking pictures of those mud-shacks you call houses.  Of course, any military that has a person called "salami" as a General only invites additional ridicule – after all, I guess when a guy’s entire family is named after a sandwich meat, one must resort to silly saber-rattling in order to get some respect. 

Salami with sharp cheddar cheese and a glass of tea….yum.

Of course, General, if you keep up with all this “hostile act” talk, you might find yourself much like “Baghdad Bob”.

That’s enough for now…more to toss later, as I read more nonsensical news.

This has got to be the most awesome picture I’ve seen all week and company policy statement I have seen all year.

West Georgia business owner Bill Looman of US Crane, LLC  is one of many very frustrated business owners who simply cannot hire people because the government’s insane policies, inabilities to balance its books, and the looming threat of Obamacare are slamming the door on the ability for small biz owners to add new people to the payroll.

Watch out, Bill.  The Occupy rabble may end up in your parking lot complaining about how you’re part of the problem.  But if they put up a tent, you can always use a crane and lift it away.

Today, North Carolina governor Bev Perdue made the stupid

"I think we ought to suspend, perhaps, elections for Congress for two years and just tell them we won’t hold it against them, whatever decisions they make, to just let them help this country recover. I really hope that someone can agree with me on that…you want people who don’t worry about the next election." – Gov. Bev Perdue

Actually, Bev, we do.  We want Congressional members and elected officials to quake in their boots (or wing-tipped shoes) over the notion that they are going to get the voter-sponsored ouster from office.  This is precisely the reason why we have elections – because if they do something in office that the public does not like, the people have the right to remove them from office.  This is a very sacred thing in our Republic.

We all get the gist of why Ms. Perdue made her statement – because Congress members are so worried that they might be elected out of office that they are consumed with that, rather than doing the business of legislating. 

However, for her to even make that statement, even in jocularity, shows that she might not have much reverence for the structure of our country. 

Democrats and Republicans are in general agreement these days that Congress is basically dysfunctional because of partisan bickering and political posturing.  However the bigger question at present is before the Democrats – how will 2012 affect Democratic chances for any sort of significant piece of the political action from 2013-2015?  Right now, President Obama is losing his base in droves.  Democratic senators in 17 races are looking like they might have to face significant opposition – some of which will lose.  With only four seats needed to take control of the Senate, it looks like Thanksgiving next year is going to be really dismal for the Democrats.  And if New York HD9 indicates anything, the Democrats are in real trouble.

Perdue’s comment represents the emerging frustration of Democrats as they see their chances to further their agenda slip away and that’s got to be crushing because they are squandering their opportunities that they have for a shot at the future and that shot is becoming less possible.

Not that I’m complaining because the Democrats have done far enough.

Yet another racist representative has marginalized herself with silly rants about how the world is unfair to people who have melanin in their skin.  Today, Rep Fredrica Wilson (D-FL) griped about how the unemployment rate was due to racism and blamed the Tea Party, calling them the enemy (and racists too).

She yammered on about how the Tea Party is singularly focused on making Obama a one-term president.

I only have one word for her:  DUH!

We Tea Partiers never wanted Obama to begin with.  We warned you about how he was going to sink the economy with his stupid liberal progressivism and he proved us right.  We warned how he would be weak on terror and we were again proven right – even though he was never able to deliver on any sort of exit strategy for Iraq and Afghanistan, although he griped about it during the campaign.  And despite his promise to close down Gitmo, well, that didn’t happen either.  I guess that’s because keeping it open wasn’t such a bad idea.

So, yes, Ms. Wilson, we want Obama to go down in history as a one-term loser like Jimmy Carter.  We want Obama to fail, because, like Rush said, America succeeds when Obama fails.  More essentially, we just want Obama to go down.

By the way, what the crap is with her stupid looking red hat?  I mean, how on earth is anyone supposed to take you seriously when you’re wearing a costume that you would wear when sitting for a photo at Glamour Shots?

You really need to fire your wardrobe advisor – or get one if you’re the one putting that get-up on.

What a moron.  Good people of Florida, vote her out.  Instead of answers, she provides gripes and blame.  That is totally useless.

Kinda like her hat.  Man she’s stupid looking.

I really can’t believe Bam said it.  I just can’t. 

Obama: ‘reversed recession until bad luck hit’.

Holy crap.  Really?? 

I’m firmly convinced now that whenever Bam tells a lie, his ears grow.  Good one, Obamanocchio.

Hell may be freezing over; it’s pretty crazy when Obama gets a bad review from Maureen Dowd

I’ve never been a big fan of Maureen Dowd – most of her stuff is nothing more than liberal nonsense written as balanced reporting, at least as far as the New York Times is concerned.

But it seems that the cruiseliner called Hope and Change may be on its way to the bottom of the ocean and now we’re seeing liberals realizing what we conservatives have known since before Obama took office – that he’s all smoke and mirrors. 

I won’t read the article she wrote to you – I’ll just post it here: President Obama’s Downgrade Blues. But I will quote one blurb from it and let you make your own judgments.

Barack Obama blazed like Luke Skywalker in 2008, but he never learned to channel the Force. And now the Tea Party has run off with his light saber.

I guess That One is glad it was only a plastic toy…

Over the last couple of days, it’s been pretty remarkable of some of the things that are coming from the maws of Democrats.  In fact, it’s getting to be so far over the top that it indicates pure desperation on the part of the Lib-Crats.

Debbie Wasserman Schultz Calls GOP Leaders “Dictators” and “using scare tactics”

So, Debbie “Dem-Blonde” Wasserman Schultz today made a rather audacious statement.  Basically, she accuses the GOP of using scare tactics and using their power to create a dictatorship.

Dictatorship – you mean the same strong-arm tactics that the Democrats used to pass the Health Care Bill, locking the GOP completely out of the discussion and passing a mammoth bill so large that the only way to find out what was in it was to just pass it?

Or how about the same scare tactics that Barack Obama used to talk about the dire consequences that would occur if Congress did not immediately pass the Stimulus bill.  And it wasn’t a scare tactic to play the Or how about most recently when the Golden One made the statement about how the Social Security checks may not go out on August 3rd, knowing full well that the cash balance of the Treasury would be approximately $74 billion and the payouts would be $22 billion. 

Christmas Chaos

Daily Caller reported a story where Dan Pfeiffer and David Plouffe made similar comments about the fact that because of the GOP’s activities, we’re looking to spoil Christmas.

Oh boo hoo.  Suits me fine.  I think Christmas is way too over-commercialized anyway.  I’d rather celebrate it with a cup of hot cocoa, sitting next to the hearth, contemplating Jesus Christ, not running up more debt.  Maybe this year, I’ll get my wish.

So, in “celebration” of this event, I defer to the great Crypt Keeper from Tales from the Crypt:

Nancy “Queen Bee” Pe-lousy Just Wants to Save the World

Weekly Standard reported a story of Nancy Pelosi lamenting how she just wants to save the world.  Uhh, you have a long way to go before you or anyone in your party has the chutzpah to save the world.  I think Jesus already did that, anyway, so why don’t you spare us your progressive liberal nonsense and let us take care of our own lives, eh? 

Wow, can we get more over the top, Nancy?  I mean, really, in 15 years, none of this will mean anything to anyone.  Heck, this will be old news next month.  But you can keep your pathetic “status quo”.  We want fiscal responsibility that keeps government in check forever!

House GOP acting “Incredibly Juvenile”

Jim Carney came off today saying the GOP was acting incredibly juvenile, for trying to force a plan through Congress.  Hey, dipstick, at least we HAVE a plan.  You coneheads haven’t come up with anything yet that actually works, other than tax the crap out of everyone to pay off people.

So, since all of us Tea Party Republicans out there are just a bunch of children to you, well, then I’ll just pull out a child like quip:

So, Jim Carney….Carney…is that your name or your title?  Sheesh, you make us want Robert Gibbs back.

Okay, I’m done…for now.

You know, I really get tired, I mean really fed up and sick of racists like Sheila Jackson Lee who start saying that the reason why Obama is getting static from Congress…

…is because he is black.

Holy crap, really??  REALLY??

I thought the fact that Obama was black was going to work to his advantage, that he was going to be able to get things done because America had evolved to a place where we could elect a president of African heritage.

Well, not QUITE African, but I digress.

So, on the house floor, she suggests that the reason why Obama gets criticized and has such a tough time, singled out as the only president who has ever had a difficult time getting anything done is because of the color of his skin.

Never mind that not once did the topic of race come up during this discussion about whether we should again defer our bills to the government credit card.  Never mind that we completely have a spending problem in the government.  Never mind the amount of waste and uselessness of the 2008 stimulus, or the pork projects, so-called “shovel-ready” jobs created, bailouts, defense spending overkill and mismanagement.  No, all of this argument is because President Obama is a man of color, so all the evil GOP’s are picking on him.

Sheila, you are a miserable ingrate.  You accuse everyone else of being a racist but it’s you who is doing the race-baiting and leveling the vitriol.  You are arrogant and corrupt.  You represent everything that Barack Obama was talking about overcoming with your racist nonsense. 

On the plus side, I guess it also proves a point that I’ve long held that, when Democrats have no other recourse in a situation, they resort to name calling and ad hominem attacks.

Source: The Hill

So, His Eminence, Barack Obama today stood before the White House press junkies and made this statement with respect to the current struggle in Congress over whether we should go further in debt to cover our spending, or cut the spending.

Obama made the statement that 80% of Americans were on his side with respect to the debate of what to include in the debt package. That means that 80% are alright with the aspect with raising taxes.

What 80% of Americans are we talking about here; the ones that live in the US or the ones who vote left wing? Obama hasn’t asked me – or anyone I know about whether they think we should have our federal taxes raised.  As a matter of fact, I’m willing to bet that 8 out of 10 people that I asked, "Hey, do you want to have your taxes raised?", they would reply with a hearty "no".

Americans do agree that something has to be done, but it’s pretty arrogant and presumptuous to say that 80% of Americans are behind him when 80% of Americans have never been behind Obama on anything.  I would argue that would also include putting a bullet in Osama Bin Laden’s brain pan.

After Obama’s whiny little spat with Eric Cantor yesterday and him stating that he was going back to the American people, rather than actually asking the American people.  Obama knows full well what Americans would actually say if he actually asked them.

Raising taxes on the rich, even if we took 100% of their earned revenue in taxes would not solve the problem at all; it’s like taking $1 to pay against a $10,000 debt.  But Obama and the Dems are playing the class warfare card, scaring the crap out of those who live on Social Security, and not bothering to look at the federal budget, line by line like he promised during the 2008 campaign, and cutting out the pork.  All the man wants to do is raise taxes, and continue to spend – tax and spend, tax and spend.

Obama absolutely refuses to back away from this point and it’s staggering that a man who purports to have an IQ around 140 can’t actually understand this point.  Obama lacks the cajones to actually go on record as cutting anything because that’s potential lost votes when 2012 starts rolling around.

And yet, Obama has the audacity to say that Congress is playing politics. If Obama was committed to this process, he would have fulfilled his campaign promises of cutting out unnecessary spending and not raising taxes.  He wants to renege on both.

The way out of this situation is what we down on Main Street live with every day: Cut the spending and live within our means.